Paper books or
screen books? That is a question that I can say that I never really thought about
until now. Before reading the article, “The Reading Brain in the Digital Age:
The Science of Paper versus Screens,” by Ferris Jbar, (http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=reading-paper-screens) that I found on Twitter from @BillSelak, I never really gave it much
thought about how I processed what I read whether it was from paper or a screen. I will admit that I still like to use paperback books and as the article
stated, most people still
like to use paperback books too. A lot of it has to do with the experience that
people have had with books ever since books have been invented. Many people
like how a book smells, the physical touch of changing a page, marking a book
with a highlighter or pen, or simply how heavy or light a book may feel. Humans
have a natural tendency to make goals and having a physical book in hand allows
people to create a “mental map” of how much they are progressing through a
book.
When people read from tablet, kindle,
smartphone, computer, or some other technology device; they simply do not experience
the same thing that a paperback book can give. For example, the device that is
used will always feel the same weight and won’t be able to map out how much is
left to read. Also, reading from a devise allows the body to interact in a
different way than reading a paperback book, which sometimes makes it difficult
to concentrate on the words. There are different senses that are used when
reading from a device rather than from a book. Despite of what people like to
read off of better, the article states that there much of significant effect on
the speed and comprehension of material.
One of my favorite points from the
article was that there was study that took place where they gave students an
assignment to read an article and then they were to answer questions based off
the reading. Half of the students had to read from a screen and the other half
of the students had to read from a paperback. The results showed that the
students who read from the screen did a little worse than the students who read
from the paperback.
I couldn’t help to think, what
this means for our future students? Many of our students are going to be taking
tests from computers and reading textbooks from some type of electronic device.
Does this mean we are hindering their chances of doing better than they could?
I think the answer is we are unsure of what it will be. The studies that have
been done state that there isn’t a drastic difference of results of how people
perform whether they take a test from a computer or paper and I believe a lot
of it has to do with they were raised to use paper at some point in their life.
However, for the babies that are born now and if they never interact with paper,
then maybe there brains will be trained to read from electronic devices thoroughly
and gain full comprehension from it, because that is all that they will know.
·